Conus granularis (Borson, 1820)
Conus granuliferus (Grateloup, 1835)
Conus granularis var. stachey (Hoernes &
Auinger, 1879)
Conus stachei (Hoernes & Auinger, 1879)
Conus granuliferus var. opellus (Gregorio,
1885)
Conus granulifer (Peyrot, 1931)
Conus (Conasprella) minutissima (Harzhauser
& Landau, 2016)
Descrizione e caratteristiche:
Conchiglia
di piccole dimensioni. Questa
specie č frequente nel Miocene e ricorda alcuni Hemiconus eocenici come
l’Hemiconus defrancei e l’Hemiconus scabriculus. Il genere Hemiconus
č perň da considerare come caratteristico dell’Eocene (3).
Il Conus granularis taurolaevigata
(Sacco, 1893) č caratteristica dell’Elveziano.
Il Conus granularis dertosimplex
(Sacco, 1893) ha delle granulazioni che sembra che si possano individuare anche
nell’esemplare illustrato.
Il Conus granuliferus
(Grateloup, 1835) č da considerare una varietŕ del Conus granularis.
Conus Granularis — Borson 1820: 196, pl. 1, fig. 3.
Conus
(Stephanoconus) Stachei nov. form.—
Hoernes & Auinger 1879: 16, pl. 6, figs 14–16.
[ Conus granuliferus Grat. var.] Drnowitzensis de Greg.— De Gregorio 1885: 376.
[ Conus granuliferus Grat. var.] opellus de Greg. — De Gregorio 1885: 376 [nov. nom. pro Conus stachei in Hoernes &
Auinger 1879, pl. 6, fig. 14].
[ Conus] H.[emiconus] granularis var. Stachei (H. A.)—Sacco
1893: 123, pl. 11, fig. 37.
[ Conus
(Hemiconus) granularis var. Stachei] var.
druowitzensis [sic] De Greg.—Sacco 1893: 123 [nov. nom. pro Conus stachei in
Hoernes & Auinger 1879, pl. 6, fig. 15].
[ Conus
(Hemiconus) granularis var. Stachei] var. lissitzensis Sacc. —Sacco 1893: 123 [nov. nom. proConus stachei in
Hoernes & Auinger 1879, pl. 6, fig. 16].
Hemiconus
granularis Bors. —Friedberg
1911: 45, pl. 2, fig. 10.
Conus (Hemiconus) granularis Bors. var. stachei Hörn. u. Auin.— Meznerics 1932 /1933: 346, pl. 14, fig. 2.
Conus (Stephanoconus) stachei Hoernes et Auinger—Csepreghy-Meznerics 1956: 421, pl. 3, fig. 7.
Conus (Hemiconus) granularis Borson—Kojumdgieva in Kojumdgieva &
Strachimirov 1960: 208, pl. 49, fig. 2.
Conus (Hemiconus) granularis stachei Hoernes & Auinger—Strausz 1966:
450, pl. 66, fig. 9.
Conus (Stephanoconus) granularis stachei Hoernes et Auinger, 1879 — Hinculov 1968: 152, pl. 38, figs 11a–b.
Conus granularis
Bronn, 1820 [sic]— Zelinskaya et al. 1968: 228, pl. 51,
fig. 19.
Conus (Hemiconus) granularis stachei Hoernes et Auinger—Csepreghy-Mezneric 1972: 34, pl. 17, figs 23–24.
Conus granularis
Borson—Pavia 1976: 157, pl. 2,
fig. 12 (holotype).
Conus (Hemiconus) granularis stachei ( Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) — Atanacković 1985: 181, pl. 40, figs 13–14.
Hemiconus
granularis ( Borson, 1820) —
Bałuk 1997: 54, pl. 20, figs 1–4.
Conilithes
granularis ( Borson, 1820) — Kovács & Vicián 2013: 93, fig. 160.
Revised description (3). Small shells of about 13–15 mm in length, biconical,
with moderately high conical spire and stout, ventricose last whorl; slightly
constricted at base. Protoconch high conical, comprising at least three whorls.
Early spire whorls forming a narrow, beaded upper sutural band and a
tuberculate lower part. Subsequent spire whorls consisting of two adsutural
spiral bands separated by a narrow groove; a secondary spiral cord appears between
the spiral bands on late spire whorls; upper band usually bearing small beads.
Subsutural flexure very shallow, moderately curved, nearly symmetrical. Last
whorl weakly angulated in subadult shells, rounded in adults; broad and weak
nodes appear along the shoulder in some specimens resulting in a wavy
appearance. Widely spaced pustulose spiral ridges on lower half of last whorl
grading into sharp spiral cords on ventral side. Upper half of last whorl with
sharp spiral cords, which rarely bear beads. Base faintly constricted. Aperture
straight, slightly broadening in abapical half. Fasciole short, moderately
swollen, covered with spiral threads. No colour pattern observed.Shell measurements
and ratios. n = 13 adult specimens; largest specimen: SL: 15.2 mm, MD: 7.9 mm,
mean SL: 13.6 mm (σ = 0.8), mean MD: 7.2 (σ =
0.4), spire angle: µ = 68° (σ =
2.9°), last whorl angle: µ = 41° (σ = 4.6°), LW: µ = 1.9 (σ =
0.07), RD: µ = 0.74 (σ = 0.04),
PMD: µ = 0.9 (σ = 0.05),
RSH: µ = 0.29 (σ = 0.03).
Discussion (3). This species is synonymized with the Italian early
Miocene to Pliocene Conus granularis ( Borson,
1820) (e.g. Bałuk 1997). Conus
granuliferus Grateloup, 1835, from the early Miocene of the Aquitaine Basin, was also considered a
synonym of C. granularis by most authors (e.g. Hall 1966, Lozouet et al. 2001).
The specimens from the Badenian of the Paratethys
seemingly differ from the Italian and French specimens in their mode of spire
formation. Hall (1966) and Davoli (1972) described and figured a spire
sculpture consisting of two cords separated by a deep groove. The same
sculpture is seen in the somewhat abraded holotype of Conus granularis as illustrated in Pavia (1976) and in the French specimen illustrated in
Lozouet et al. (2001).
The Paratethyan shells, however, develop a secondary cord
on the groove separating the two main cords. Some specimens ofA. granularis from the Tortonian of Italy in the NHMW-collection, however, show a
clear secondary cord as well. Therefore, this feature seems to reflect
intraspecific variability and consequently we do not separate the Paratethyan
specimens as a distinct species.
Sacco (1893b) placed the Italian Conus granularis Borson, 1820 in Hemiconus Cossmann, 1889, which in our opinion is an exclusively Eocene genus.
Consequently, Friedberg (1911) and Bałuk (1997) treated the Paratethyan
species also as Hemiconus. Its type species, Hemiconus
stromboides ( Lamarck, 1803), from the Eocene of the Paris Basin, is high spired fusiform species
with blunt nodes on the spire whorls. Other species placed in Hemiconus by Cossmann & Pissarro (1911) show a similar spire sculpture of
nodes and a granulose cord along the upper suture. These morphologies have
nothing in common with the Miocene species and therefore the placement in Hemiconus is herein rejected.
Tucker & Tenorio (2009) listed Conus granularis Borson, 1820 within Conilithes Swainson, 1840, but the mode of spire formation in C. granularis is different from the scalariform spire of Conilithes. Moreover, the spirally elongate beads on the last
whorl of C. granularis do not occur in any Conilithes species and we follow the recommendation by John K. Tucker (pers.
comm.) to treat Conus stachei (= granularis) tentatively as Artemidiconus, despite the
large geographic gap between the European Miocene record and the extant Western
Atlantic occurrence.Artemidiconus
granularis is a moderately variable species. Adult specimens are more ventricose than the comparatively more
slender subadult ones, which have a more pronounced shoulder. Similarly, the
sculpture of beads on the last whorl displays some variability. This
intraspecific and ontogenetic variability led de Gregorio (1885) and Sacco
(1893) to propose new variation names for each of theConus stachei specimens illustrated by Hoernes & Auinger (1879). Consequently, one
of the three names of de Gregorio (1885) and Sacco (1893) is an objective
synonym of C. stachei and the other two are subjective synonyms. To settle this, a lectotype
of C. stachei has to be selected. Thus, we designate the specimen illustrated as fig.
14 by Hoernes & Auinger (1879) as lectotype of Conus stachei.
Paleoenvironment (3).
In the Vienna Basin, this species is found in shallow sublittoral
settings partly with sea grass meadows (e.g. Zuschin et al. 2007).
Distribution in Paratethys (3).
Badenian (middle Miocene): Vienna Basin:
Baden, Steinebrunn, Niederleis ( Austria), Hrušovany nad Jevišovkou, Sedlec (
Czech Republic) ( Hoernes & Auinger 1879; Sieber 1956); Bükk Mountains:
Borsodbóta ( Hungary);
Pannonian Basin: Szob ( Hungary) (Csepreghy-Mecnerics
1956; Strausz 1966; Kovács & Vicián 2013);
Carpathian Foredeep: Drnovice u Vyškova, Lysice
( Czech Republic), Korytnica, Małoszów, Dryszczów ( Poland), Sboriw (
Ukraine) ( Hoernes & Auinger 1879; Zelinskaya et al. 1968; Bałuk
1997); Transylvanian Basin: Coşteiu de Sus, Lăpugiu de Sus ( Romania)
( Hoernes & Auinger 1879; Boettger 1902); Caransebeş-Mehadia Basin:
Valea Bela Reca ( Romania) ( Hinculov 1968); Dacian Basin: Portitovci (
Bulgaria) ( Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960); southern Pannonian Basin:
Hrvaćani ( Bosnia and Herzegovina) ( Atanacković 1985).
Proto-Mediterranean Sea and north
eastern Atlantic (3):
Aquitanian ( France: Aquitaine Basin) ( Lozouet et al. 2001)
Burdigalian ( Italy: Colli Torinesi; France Aquitaine Basin)
( Peyrot 1931; Hall 1966)
Tortonian ( Italy: Sant'Agata Fossili, Stazzano
Montegibbio) ( Davoli 1972).
|
|
|
Conus granularis (Borson,
1820) Lectotype MIGT mm. 14,8 x 7,3 Valle d’Andona(2) |
A1–A3. Artemidiconus
granularis (Borson, 1820) Lysice
(Czech Republic), NHMW 1865/0015/0004 Conus
stachei (Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) Specimen illustrated in Hoernes & Auinger (1879,
pl. 6, fig. 16) (= holotype of Conus
granularis lissitzensis Sacco, 1893) |
Conus
stachei (Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) (5) Specimen illustrated in Hoernes & Auinger (1879,
pl. 6, fig. 16) (= holotype of Conus
granularis lissitzensis Sacco, 1893) |
|
|
|
|
B1–B3. Artemidiconus granularis (Borson,
1820), Baden (Austria), NHMW 1999z0077/0025 Specimen illustrated in Hoernes & Auinger (1879,
pl. 6, fig. 14) (= holotype of Conus
granuliferus opellus De Gregorio, 1885) |
Conus stachei (Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) (5) Lectotype of Conus stachei (3) Specimen illustrated in Hoernes & Auinger (1879,
pl. 6, fig. 14) (= holotype of Conus
granuliferus opellus De Gregorio, 1885) |
|
|
|
|
|
Conus stachei (Hoernes & Auinger, 1879) (5) Conus granularis var. drnowitzensis (De Gregorio, 1885) |
|
|
|
|
Conasprella minutissima(3) G1–G3. Conasprella minutissima nov. sp., Steinebrunn
(Austria), NHMW 1869/0001/0331c, paratype. H1–H3. Conasprella minutissima nov. sp., Steinebrunn
(Austria), NHMW 1869/0001/0331b, paratype. I1–I2. Conasprella
minutissima nov. sp., Steinebrunn
(Austria), NHMW 1869/0001/0331a, holotype. |
|
|
|
|
|
Conus eichwaldi (3) B1–B2. Conilithes eichwaldi nov. nom., Zalisce (Ukraine),
ZISP 62085. C1–C2. Conilithes eichwaldi nov. nom., Zalisce (Ukraine),
ZISP 62085. |
|
|
Hemiconus
granularis mm. 14,2 x 7,5 – Aquitaniano – Landes [AZFC N. 264-09] |
|
|
|
Conus granularis mm. 14,5 x 7,8 – Aquitaniano – Landes [AZFC N. 264-08] |
Conus granularis mm. 16,4 x 7,9 – Aquitaniano – Landes [AZFC N. 264-12] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conus granularismm. 16,4 x 7,9 Aquitaniano – Landes [AZFC N. 264-12] |
Conus granularis (Borson, 1820) Lectotype MIGT mm.
14,8 x 7,3 Valle d’Andona(2) |
Conus granularis mm. 14,5 x 7,8 Aquitaniano – Landes [AZFC N. 264-08] |
Hemiconus granularismm. 14,2 x 7,5 Aquitaniano – Landes [AZFC N. 264-09] |
|
|
|
|
Conus granularis (Borson 1820) mm. 11,8 x 6,3 Miocene – Aquitaniano
Saint Martin d'Oney
[AZFC N. 264-10] |
Conus granularis (Borson 1820) mm. 10,5 x 5,8 Miocene – Aquitaniano Saint Martin d'Oney [AZFC N. 264-11] |
Conus granularis (Sacco, 1893) mm. 10,3 x 5,1 Aquitaniano – Mont de Marsan [AZFC N. 264-02]
|
Conus granularis (Sacco, 1893) mm. 9,8 x
5,4 Aquitaniano – Mont de Marsan [AZFC
N. 264-01] |
|
|
|
|
Conus granuliferus (Grateloup, 1835) Conus Hemiconus granulifer (Peyrot, 1931) mm. 8,5 x 4,5 AQUITANIANO
– Mont de Marsan [AZFC
N. 264-05] |
|
|
|
Bibliografia Consultata